Virtualization is a huge buzzword in the enterprise. CIOs around the globe are questioning whether they should stick with existing infrastructure or switch to a new virtual server setup that, according to vendors, will deliver all of the benefits of legacy solutions but with fewer headaches.
However, a new study commissioned by Veeam Software, a virtual backup company, tells a much different story. Of the 500 CIOs from France, Germany, the United Kingdom and the U.S. who participated in the survey, most of them expressed issues with virtual server recovery times, data protection and cost. "At first glance, the fears of CIOs look to be correct: Despite the potential for faster, more efficient data protection that virtualization offers and the advances modern data protection tools can provide, recovery times have increased since 2011," according to Veeam Software CEO Ratmir Timashev. "This apparent loss of momentum in data protection comes down to two influences. First, virtual infrastructure is constantly growing. As well as forming the majority of IT infrastructure now, it will continue to grow in the future. Second, organizations are not updating their data protection tools and strategies to match."
Virtual Vs. Physical Servers Recovery times for virtual servers took about five hours, which is an improvement over the six hours of recovery time required with physical servers, according to CIOs.
IT Solutions Builder TOP IT RESOURCES TO MOVE YOUR BUSINESS FORWARD
Which topic are you interested in?
What is your company size?
What is your job title?
What is your job function?
Searching our resource database to find your matches...