Deep learning frameworks are becoming ubiquitous in data science and machine learning projects. As such, it’s important to understand the landscape of deep learning frameworks to choose the right one for your project. PyTorch and TensorFlow are two of the most popular deep learning frameworks today, and they are also two of the most common Python libraries for machine learning.
They are both designed to make it easier for developers to implement machine learning algorithms in their applications. While TensorFlow and PyTorch have similar uses, there are some key differences between the two that developers should be aware of when deciding which tool is best for their needs.
What is PyTorch?
PyTorch is an open-source deep learning framework developed by Meta’s (formerly known as Facebook) artificial intelligence research group. It is based on Torch, a Lua-based machine learning framework, and was first released to the public in September 2016.
While Torch has strong ties to Lua, PyTorch features Python as its base language. This makes it easier for Python developers to use deep learning tools than those requiring Lua as their core language.
Additionally, the framework is built to speed up the process between research prototyping and deployment. This makes it more agile and flexible than other deep learning frameworks that might be more rigid. For example, PyTorch provides a dynamic computational graph model in which different parts of the graph can be updated or changed without altering the original structure.
PyTorch uses modules to represent neural networks, like building blocks that can be combined to form more extensive networks. These modules have parameters that describe how they will behave during training and inference, such as optimization algorithms, activation functions, and solvers.
The flexibility of PyTorch comes from these modular components. The modularity allows users to build custom layers, so they don’t need to start from scratch when they want a new layer type or architecture.
What is TensorFlow?
TensorFlow is an end-to-end open-source software library for data analysis and machine learning. Created by the Google Brain team and initially released to the public in 2015, TensorFlow offers a flexible ecosystem of tools, libraries, and community resources that allow researchers and developers to push state-of-the-art ML and AI products.
It provides a suite of computational graphs like multi-layer neural networks (MLPs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which make it easier to develop deep neural networks. The most recent version of TensorFlow provides high-level APIs for tasks such as linear algebra, matrix multiplication, filtering, activation functions, and pooling. It also includes scalable computation support with GPU or CPU tensor processing units (TPUs).
PyTorch vs TensorFlow
As the two most popular deep learning frameworks, PyTorch and TensorFlow offer many features and functionalities. But which one is better? We’ll compare PyTorch and TensorFlow side-by-side, looking at their capabilities to help you decide which one is right for your needs.
PyTorch vs TensorFlow: Computational graph construction
PyTorch has a dynamic computational graph construction, meaning that the graph is constructed as the operations are executed. The advantage of this approach is that since graphs are built on demand, they can be less complex than in other frameworks. Complexity can be reduced because data doesn’t need to be passed around to intermediate nodes when it’s not required.
TensorFlow takes a more traditional approach and has its graphs pre-constructed at the beginning of training. It then executes computations against these graphs. There are benefits and drawbacks to both methods.
One advantage of PyTorch’s approach is that you don’t have to worry about passing data through intermediate nodes if you’re not going to use them. However, if your model gets very large, this approach may have some performance issues.
On the other hand, one drawback of using a pre-defined graph is that your models cannot change dynamically during training. If there’s an error during training and your model needs to update accordingly, you may not have enough time to re-construct new graphs before it runs out of time.
PyTorch vs TensorFlow: Level of API
In terms of API level, PyTorch offers a lower level of API, which can be advantageous for developers who want more control over their code to focus on direct work with array expressions. In the past year, PyTorch’s popularity has increased, making it the go-to tool for deep learning projects in academia and industries that rely on optimizing custom expressions.
On the other hand, TensorFlow also offers a higher level of API, which can be helpful for those who want a more streamlined development process. In terms of which is better, TensorFlow is a strong choice because it offers both high and low-level APIs. The high-level APIs are intuitive, easy to use, and have an extensive suite of tools that simplify the entire machine learning process.
The low-level APIs give users access to building modules from scratch in order to create a neural network. With this option, users are free from relying on many prebuilt modules, which means they have greater flexibility when designing neural networks.
PyTorch vs TensorFlow: Visualization
Visualization is an important aspect of deep learning, and TensorFlow has TensorBoard. It’s a great tool for debugging training models by providing real-time feedback. PyTorch does not have a dedicated visualization tool, but it does integrate with TensorBoard.
PyTorch vs TensorFlow: Dataset
TensorFlow is a powerful tool for working with large datasets. It is designed to be fast and efficient, allowing you to train your models quickly and easily. If you’re working with high-performance models and large datasets, then TensorFlow is the way to go.
However, if you’re working with low-performance models and large datasets, then PyTorch is a better option. PyTorch can handle low-performance models such as prototypes with greater speed than TensorFlow.
PyTorch vs TensorFlow: Performance and speed
When it comes to speed, PyTorch and TensorFlow provide similar fast performance. However, both have advantages and disadvantages in specific scenarios.
For instance, the performance of Python in PyTorch is faster. Still, programming models can be less flexible in PyTorch than in TensorFlow because the latter has greater support for symbolic manipulation, which allows users to perform higher-level operations. In this sense, you might want to explore each framework separately to see which one is best suited for your unique needs.
In most cases, TensorFlow should provide better performance than PyTorch because of its ability to take advantage of any GPU(s) connected to your system. There are some exceptions where PyTorch performs better than TensorFlow, such as training deep learning models using autograd, which would require significantly less memory and lead to faster training times.
PyTorch vs TensorFlow: Debugging
PyTorch is said to be easier to use than TensorFlow for debugging purposes. This is because PyTorch uses immediate execution (“eager mode”), which means you can use Python debugging tools such as pdb, ipdb, and PyCharm debugger.
In contrast, TensorFlow requires you to execute your code before you can debug it explicitly. To run your program in debug mode, you must write code for the nodes in your graph. Furthermore, you will need something like tfdbg (TensorFlow debugger) for more advanced debugging features like stack traces and watches that help find problems related to memory allocation or errors at runtime.
PyTorch vs TensorFlow: Features
PyTorch has fewer features compared to TensorFlow. However, the features that it does have are very well-designed and easy to use. For example, PyTorch’s automatic differentiation is very efficient and user-friendly, and its dynamic computational graph allows for more flexibility and ease of use. Furthermore, PyTorch supports native CUDA implementation without any hassle.
TensorFlow’s higher-level functionalities provide a wide range of options. The deep learning library by Google can be used both on CPU and GPU, making it possible to deploy models at high speed with low latency. Moreover, TensorFlow comes with an API in many programming languages such as Python, Java, C++, and others, providing even easier access to its powerful library capabilities.
PyTorch vs TensorFlow: Head-to-head comparison
In the chart below, we’ll compare the features and attributes of both frameworks.
|Facebook (Now Meta)
|Large datasets, high-performance
|Large datasets, high-performance
|Easy to debug
|Difficult to debug
|Easy to learn
|Difficult to learn
|C++, CUDA, Python
|Complex and difficult to read
|Difficult to implement
PyTorch vs TensorFlow: Which one to choose?
Both PyTorch and TensorFlow are state-of-the-art deep learning frameworks, but there are some key distinctions to consider. PyTorch is generally easier to use and supports dynamic computation graphs. TensorFlow is more mature with a larger number of libraries, but it also requires some extra time to learn and understand the concepts.
Before deciding which one to choose, it’s important to decide what you’re trying to achieve in your deep learning project. If you want a fast-learning framework that doesn’t require as much work, then PyTorch may be for you. If you need a production-ready framework that can support heavy calculations, TensorFlow may be the best option for you.
PyTorch is best for research-oriented developers looking for a quick start on their projects. It has great GPU capabilities, an easy-to-use API, excellent debugging tools, and is scalable. Those with experience with TensorFlow will find the transition to PyTorch seamless.
On the other hand, TensorFlow is best for those building AI-related products or solutions. With its high-level APIs, it offers good scalability and a lot of pre-trained models. However, it does take longer to learn how to code because of its higher level of abstraction. This means more knowledge about computer science and engineering is required for TensorFlow.
Overall, both frameworks offer great speed and come equipped with strong Python APIs, making them versatile enough for any type of machine learning application or task.
Read next: Best Machine Learning Companies