Other industries are similarly IT-challenged. Whether hotel supplies or ready-made doors, dozens of industries are still populated by hundreds, if not thousands, of small specialty suppliers who still can't afford EDI, let alone the more sophisticated ERP systems needed to take humans out of the loop. "RosettaNet, with its data definition standards and low-cost Web platform, promises an innovative solution to the problem of having a highly fragmented supply base," says Stanford University supply-chain expert Hau L. Lee, who is conducting a study sponsored by RosettaNet and two of its board members, Intel and Arrow Electronics, Inc., of RosettaNet's potential payoffs to businesses. To put it more simply, says Hal Varian, dean of the University of California at Berkeley's School of Information Management and Systems: "If the electronics industry and RosettaNet can't do it, then few other industries will be able to follow." And that, he adds, would put a serious crimp in how fastand how farthe Internet revolution can realistically be used by industries everywhere to wring out savings, boost productivity and integrate all industry players around a common goal.
RosettaNet backers are feeling the heat. The consortium's executives, who today represent some 400 companies from FedEx Corp. to Cisco Systems, acknowledge the problems, and amid the ongoing industry slump have been scrambling to turn things around. RN's Hamilton, who came on board in February 2000 to make changes, admits the organization was spinning its wheels for much of last year. She attributes the consortium's glacial progress to an overly ambitious development effort that has since been scaled back. Last year, she says, RN created a list of all the standards that would be needed to tie industry players to the Web and then began asking participants to use them. "But the list kept getting longer and longer," Hamilton says. "It was never going to end."
So what's RosettaNet's problem? First, early adopters have yet to agree on seemingly mundane matters such as standard ways to identify and describe common electronic components. Virtually every company has its own internally developed nomenclature for every item in its inventory. A simple capacitor, for example, is listed by one 14-digit inventory number at Solectron but by a completely different number at Hewlett-Packard. Nearly every company in Solectron's supply chain uses its own set of numbers for each item in its inventorycreating multiple ID numbers for the same product parts. "Automated trading won't go very far until companies can similarly describe what they're buying and selling," says UC-Berkeley's Varian.
Trying to take all of this global has been especially difficult. Two years ago, RosettaNet's members agreed to adopt a Global Trade Item Number to standardize product identification. But this spring the effort ground to a halt as component makers, distributors and contract manufacturers of computers quarreled over whose methods deserved to be standardized, among other issues. And until an accord can be reached, every company in the supply chain must maintain an ever-changing "look-up list" to match all the ID numbers of all the components carried by every company they do business with, slowing the process of doing business by hours, if not days, each time.
And there have been other roadblocks. Part of the RosettaNet challenge has been to develop standard definitions of individual electronic parts, but so far, three years after its launch, only some 3,600 out of a possible 10,000 or more "dictionary" definitions of, say, "price," "shipping," "processor speed" and "modem" have been devised.
RosettaNet also aims to standardize business processes across the supply chain, enabling one company's system to tap into another's system automatically online. Fifty-seven of a possible 100-plus business process standards, or PIPs, "are ready to go or are in late production," says RosettaNet's Hamilton. But most companies are using only one or two order management process standards in demonstration projects, and with only one or two partners out of a supply chain of thousands. Says Solectron's Jenkins: "This is a very big task, breathtaking in ambition. The amount of detail that is planned for the process and data definitions is very significant. Add to that the fact that more detail is going to be added to these process standards, and we're talking here about a very big effort that will take years and will never really be completed."
Companies need to change their existing networks to handle RosettaNet's process standards. "When your customer sends you an order and that order triggers the transaction, your system has to be able to handle that RosettaNet standard or definition, or it's not going to work for you," says Solectron Vice President and CIO Bud Mathaisal. But hardly anyone is prepared yet to let their existing networks, such as ERP systems, "talk" to each other automatically, without supervisiona goal of RosettaNet. At Solectron, for example, 95 percent of all electronic transactions are made using EDI, while only 5 percent use RosettaNet. And because there has been such little demand for RosettaNet, software vendors have been refusing to code RosettaNet standards into their applications, says Hamilton.
But the biggest problem underlying all of these roadblocks is culturenot technology, say Lee and other supply-chain experts. Shifting to RosettaNet standards, participants say, implies a loss of power and perceived control over their piece of the supply chainand that's hard for many executives to accept. Companies involved in the RosettaNet experiment, Jenkins says, are still trying to "capture their own special processes and hide them as much as possible from the rest of the world. That's 180 degrees different from the RosettaNet strategy. There are significant internal acceptance barriers to overcomeand they will be overcome, but one executive at a time." In the Net-wired world, he says, knowledge is not just power, it is an asset to be appropriated, refined, enhanced and sold.
The lesson here for CIOs everywhere: Culture mattersand it must change to accommodate the cost-savings potential the Net can provide. "You can only go so far harnessing up your operation or industry to the Net before you have to start changing the entire organization and existing relationships among people," says Stanford's Mendelson. Adds Don Tapscott, co-author of Digital Capital: Harnessing the Power of Business Webs (Harvard Business Press, 2000), a guide to corporate survival in the new economy: "It's not easy for some of these guys to get naked. To succeed on the Internet, especially in these groups we call B-Webs like the virtual supply chain that RosettaNet is aiming to build, companies must prepare to reveal information about themselves, their products and their business processes, even previously sacrosanct information, and even to competitors, because it will be in their common interest."
But don't write off RosettaNet yet. Among RosettaNet CEO Hamilton's turn-around goals is a "milestones program" in which RN's largest original equipment manufacturing membersincluding Intel and Hewlett-Packardhave agreed to connect up to 100 mid-tier suppliers using at least one RosettaNet process standard. Hamilton is also planning to roll out other incentives to lead more companies to participate, including convincing software vendors to start writing and marketing RosettaNet-ready software to make it easier for companies large and small to standardize their business processes and parts designations. Many in the industry, including Jenkins, say this has been among the biggest reasons for RN's acceptance troubles.
Maybe so, but it's also true that it's impossible to wire up a paper-dependent industry overnight. RosettaNet is off to a slow start, and mistakes were made, UC-Berkeley's Varian says. But there's no turning back. "First the electronics industry," Varian says, "and next, the world." In other words, if CIOs are not looking to standardize supply-chain processes and language and wire them all up to the Web, they may have to be soon. Cost-cutting and adopting new technologies are the old way to gain advantage over rivals, but in the future, says business management guru Gary Hamel, it will be product and service innovation. "You can't be innovating stuff for customers if most of your brain matter and resources are wrapped around keeping inventories low and eliminating paper in your supply chain," he says. "That's old economy stuff."
All the more reason, say experts, for RosettaNet to get back on track. Says Mendelson: "If RosettaNet fails, it will not fail because the goal was flawed. It will fail because the culture lagged behind the potential of the technology."
Patrick Porter writes about technology from his home in Quincy, Mass. He recently completed a four-year stint as editor-in-chief of Software Magazine. Comments on this story can be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org.
This article was originally published on 07-01-2001